Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Barnes (cook)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Thanks all for the sourcing deep dive. I withdraw the nom. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Barnes (cook) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing to meet WP:NCREATIVE and WP:GNG. 2 sources are passing mentions, the other is a single paragraph, nothing more from WP:BEFORE searches. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 23:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tulane Archives - Notable and useful
Newspapers.com AND Newspapers.com2 AND Newspapers.com3 - I cannot see. If the article is actually about the subject, it could be useful
Google Books - I could not open this source
"New Orleans Cuisine" - Seems like this could be a decent mention. I can only see one page on Google Books, but the mention seems to surpass triviality.
Baltimore Sun - Obituary, routine news coverage. Does not confer notability, most people have an obituary.
WWNO - Some okay coverage
So far, the sources as provided convince me to give a soft keep. I couldn't find anything else on my 19 page google search, but I think the sources as provided just push the subject over the edge into notability. Ikjbagl (talk) 06:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.