Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning for Life UK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 00:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Learning for Life UK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-prodded by IP without rationale. Prod reason was "While their cause is valiant, this charity isn't notable." DrStrauss talk 12:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Power~enwiki (talk) 23:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found one mention of this charity co-organising a workshop in Bangladesh (New Nation, 2012 – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) but nothing providing the depth of coverage about the charity itself needed to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. and I think it could have been deleted as A7 speedy. There's noclaim of significance. DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.