Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazlow Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lazlow Jones

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:V, and WP:BLPSTYLE BonkHindrance (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. BonkHindrance (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article looks like an attempted promotion. His endeavors have not attracted significant and reliable media coverage beyond fansites and pop culture listcicle sites, even though he has had shows on XM. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - While I agree this article needs to be re-worded to remove promotional material, Lazlow's work with Rockstar has given him a lot of independent and significant coverage. There is a lot of coverage available, and WP:NEXIST states that notability is based on the existence of sources, not on the sourcing in an article. – ᕼᗩᑎᗪOTO (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Handoto. Promotional material should be removed. Other that that, the article is good enough to pass WP:NEXIST and WP:GNG. _SUPER ^ASTIG 02:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Supporters of keep should specifically list the sources which give significant coverage of the subject.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 00:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above, notable. ―cobaltcigs 11:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.