Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurette Koellner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laurette Koellner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Executive chairman is NOT CEO. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In my opinion the subject passes GNG. Amsterdad (talk) 12:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Forbes, Seattle Times, Businessweek, Bloomberg - certainly not a "Lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources" 基 (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep coverage seems sufficient for GNG.--Staberinde (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.