Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Petrecca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus after the relistings -- especially because I consider this would even qualify for speedy A7. DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Petrecca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches have found expected mentions at News, Books and Highbeam but nothing actually convincingly better for the applicable notability such as WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.