Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Hartman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was article sent to Wikipedia:Copyright problems. howcheng {chat} 21:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page appears to be a vanity page. Much of the information is not verifiable Akingheonds 17:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --Person does not appear to be noteworthy enough to merit entry. The entry is basically the person's resume.

Delete Person is not noteworthy nor is information verifiable.

• Keep and cleanup. Notable business professor namechecked by Fortune Magazine as one of America's leading business ethicists [1]. According to the article she has written several books including this cowriting credit [2]. Listed in the American Directory of Scholars. Notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 00:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Article contains copyrighted material copied verbatim from another website [3].

• Neutral - person is just on the line regarding notability/professor test. In light of previous (unsigned) comment, I'd rather see a rewritten article and judge that than deleting this one completely without someone adding at least one more item to establish notability (is there something specific that would make her notable to a person in Peoria?). B.Wind 15:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN, resume, vanity Paul 18:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd be going for a weak keep but it's a copyvio, I'm going to blank this and send it to copyvios. Stifle 21:37, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Author, co-author or editor of four books on Amazon. Text seems likely to be autobiographical, which is badish, but probably makes it a non-copyvio, as it is likely that she has written and owns the rights to the presentation of herself in other places too. If no permission is shown for that text, allow for recreation. u p p l a n d 00:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete vanity page. Abstrakt 19:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.