Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latus (game)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Latus (game)
- Latus (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This game was never released. DimaG (talk) 03:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article even says there is little known about the game (as of March 2008? Come on!). And the external links are to Whois and the US Patent Office??? Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Easy call, not notable, no decent references. Jusdafax 08:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unreleased and non-notable game. Reyk YO! 12:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Hard to understand why this was put in at all. SteveStrummer (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I find mention of it on their official Myst Online forums, and elsewhere. It was never finished, and may not have gotten past the planning stage though. So nothing to have an article about. Dream Focus 15:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SNOW. Even Dream Focus doesn't think this article should exist, and that's saying a lot (although Dream presumably couldn't bring him/herself to actually type the abhorrent "D" word). SnottyWong soliloquize 15:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'm uncomfortable with the previous comment: it's unclear if the two of you know each other or are friends, but in any case an unexplained public comment like that crosses into incivility. SteveStrummer (talk) 16:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, that was out of line, SW. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - absolutely no coverage whatsoever in reliable independent sources. Claritas § 09:59, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.