Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laththi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify (move over Draft:Laththi). Sandstein 08:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laththi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Laththi

Unreleased movie that does not satisfy guidelines on notability for future films or general notability. An article should speak for itself and show why it satisfies general notability. This article does not. It should not be necessary to check the references to see if there is content. However, the references are predictably unhelpful, and include 404 errors, and publicity stuff.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	Times of India	404 error		No	Not usually
2	Times of India	Another 404 error		No	Not usually
3	Telegraphstar.com	Announcement about film	No		Probably	No
4	Pinkvilla	Nothing that seems to be about film	No	No		No
5	Pinkvilla	Story about production of film	No	Yes		No

There is a draft in draft space at Draft:Laththi which has been nominated for deletion. The draft should be kept because it is this article that is too soon and should be deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not meet NFF yet but the draft should be worked on until it releases. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Re-draftify. It fails my criteria by a whisker. It has completed principal photography, great, but it is not sufficiently scheduled for release, the reference saying only "is likely to be released in August 2022". When the theatrical release data is locked in, then mainspace the draft. -- SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Histmerge into the draft, since the main space article seems to have been created by copy paste moving the draft in multiple stages (e.g. the first revision of this article has a clean-up template that has been copied from the draft). 192.76.8.77 (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.