Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Marciano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 23:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Marciano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography fails Wikipedia musician guidelines. There is a lack of reliable sources available to properly substantiate the article. For the sources given: the LA Music Awards apparently have a story unto themselves, "The LA Music Scene" is apparently a press release (if not, hardly reliable), and one review (that we cannot confirm) by Music Connection does not warrant an article. Furthermore, weasel words strewn throughout the lead make the page come off as an advertisement. Blurpeace 22:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Linked off his own page are what look like legitimate scans from music magazines Music Connection 2003 and All Access Magazine 2003 (though I have no idea if these are reliable sources themselves nor if scans of magazine articles are appropriate for Wikipedia). Additionally there are numerous indications that one of his songs, "The Way it Used to Be" was in the American Pie 2 movie (though not on the official soundtrack release) however, other than the two links above I haven't been able to find any good sources for this (only a lot of forum posts and the like). Also the lead paragraph from the article appears to be ripped from his website and needs to be rewritten. SQGibbon (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not convinced by the reliability of the sources. only found trivial coverage. nothing in the article says notability to be. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.