Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larissa Takchi

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus instead of keep as there's some valid concerns about the sourcing. That said, a consensus to delete the material is not going to develop. Star Mississippi 15:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Larissa Takchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO basics, mostly a WP:BIO1E person only known for being a winner of a reality show, which generally fails GNG guidelines. Suggest redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 11) instead. SanAnMan (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Takchi is maintaining a profile with coverage such as Byrne, Fiona (2 May 2021), "Wedding of the week", Herald Sun and Moustafa, Abi (29 September 2021), "Bun in the oven! Former MasterChef winner Larissa Takchi announces she's expecting her first baby with husband Luke Dominello", Daily Mail Australia. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Interviews do not meet the WP:SIGCOV standard, as they are not independent of the subject. - SanAnMan (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per duffbeerforme, meets WP:SUSTAINED. The claim that interviews don't meet WP:SIGCOV is wrong - there is no policy to that effect, it is an essay merely warning users to be careful because some interviews can be promotional. There is no suggestion this is the case here. Deus et lex (talk) 08:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.