Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larceny and Old Lace
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Larceny and Old Lace
- Larceny and Old Lace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable on its own terms, but perhaps it can be merged with the Arsenic and Old Lace entry? Ecoleetage (talk) 22:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or maybe redirect to List of The Golden Girls episodes. Non-notable spoof, and the "award" is given by an equally nn company that publishes and licenses plays. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; not notable, no external references. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 05:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Only 26 Google hits for the "award" that constitutes the sum total of such notoriety as this article claims. [1] RGTraynor 15:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete school plays are most definitely short of the notability bar. Under no circumstances is a merge with Arsenic and Old Lace recommended. B.Wind (talk) 04:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.