Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lara Julian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lara Julian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this meets the standards for notability of creative artists, There do not apear to be any works in major museums--even some of the exhibitions listed are "private viewings." There do not appear to be any substantial critical studies--all of the references appear to be notices or promotion. As I understand it, part of the purpose of afc is to keep articles like this out of mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of dcontemporary.com, gabrielfineart.co.uk,edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk, globalartagency.wordpress.com,issuu.com, view.publitas.com, artisttalkmagazine.com, blurb.com or larajulian.com are independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 12:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we lack the indepdent reliable sources needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think it is great to read about new upcoming artists. There are many interesting references to exhibitions and articles. I do not think exhibiting in big museums should be the the criteria for being shown on Wikipedia. I enjoyed reading Lara’s biography and believe it meets Wikipedia guidelines.Marishyr (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Striking vote from confirmed sock puppet account of Alyaww. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC) [reply]
— Marishyr (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Vexations (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Deleting the page about Lara Julian is not right. The page has enough references directly about her which are independent sources. The deletion needs a review. Alyaww (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alyaww: Sorry but your sockpuppet vote above this one (Marishyr) does not count.--- Possibly (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : All the Magazines that are mentioned in references are independent sources. Moreover, Lara Julian’s works were shown in Venice Biennale which is a major art event. All commercial art galleries do private views, however only the opening night are private and the public can surely visit the exhibitions after. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:C99A:C101:B1:EF70:59EE:3F2 (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP, I think what you mean to say is that she had a show in Venice during the Biennale, similar to how I myself might have stayed in a hotel or had some nice pasta in Venice during the Biennale. I would guess that any show she had there was a paid one, as such paid show sin Venice are very common. According to the source, the pieces she showed in Venice, apparently, were at the "Venice Art House", which only has a Facebook page as web presence. --- Possibly (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete carries the hallmarks of paid spam sources. I don't see any genuine sources amidst the promotional junk pile. --- Possibly (talk) 01:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the source for "artist talk magazine", after seeing that it's a paid placement.--- Possibly (talk) 02:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete can't find any reliable sources at all. Curiocurio (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet the GNG guidelines/artist guidelines e.g. none of her works are held in the permanent collections of significant institutions. MurielMary (talk) 07:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST, have been unable to find anything that shows that work has received any wikisignificant attention, part of wikinotable exhibitions, or in any wikinotable gallery/museum collections. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.