Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamar School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lamar School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:ORG. elektrik SHOOS 02:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NHS. Racepacket (talk) 16:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wp.NHS is an essay, not a policy or guideline. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy and delete as there is no indication of notability. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - contains a high school and, as always, what is required is attention to research sources not a rush to deletion. When you have a new editor, experienced editors should provide guidance not propose their pages for deletion within 13 minutes whilst still being written - see WP:BITE.TerriersFan (talk) 21:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per longstanding practice of retaining high school articles.--Milowent (talk) 04:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Secondary schools are invariably held to be inherently notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just noting that I completely disagree with Wikipedia practice that holds that all high schools are inherently notable. Hopefully this will change in the future. Them From Space 06:01, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the strong precedent of considering high schools automatically notable. Swarm^Talk 03:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.