Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lal Bahadur Dewan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lal Bahadur Dewan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I put this up as a PROD, which was contested by the original author. The author has added more information, but I don't think it passes WP:GNG. As an example, a major source is still a "Prolonged interview of Mr L B Dewan taken by the author from 10/3/2019 to 22/3/2019", which is the epitome of a non-reliable source. Most of the sources mention the subject in passing (at best) or are unreliable (Facebook, personal interviews, a voter ID card (?), etc.). 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:COI-ridden article with no real basis for notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.