Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakshmi Machine Works

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 18:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Machine Works (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam and promotional. Fails WP:NCORP RationalPuff (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Not spam or promotional. This is a major public company. Economic Times coverage of it as a stock includes long timeline (with substantial text in complete sentences) here (and cited in article). Deleting this would be equivalent to deleting one of Fortune 500 companies in U.S. Of course there is tons of coverage existing about truly huge/major publicly traded industrial organizations. --Doncram (talk) 06:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I don't view the present version of the article (perm link) as promotional, and it certainly is not spam. Rather, the article presents some facts about the company in a neutral manner. If a company is highly successful in its field, it is encyclopedic to mention it in a neutral manner. Not seeing any real promotional language there extolling the benefits of its products, solicitations to do business with the company, etc. That said, it does need more sources to verify some of the claims therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep There are a lot of garbage fake RS talking about this company, but also enough legit ones like Business Standard [1] and The New Indian Express [2] but don't let a quick google search fool you: there is a lot of wordpress rubbish pimping this corp. --LaserLegs (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.