Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LT24

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 12:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LT24 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Considering this article doesn't have a mirror in Spanish Wikipedia, it already sets off alarm bells. That, plus it's been unsourced since March 2007. Time for an investigation, methinks. Coin945 (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This page is an utter disaster! But this station definitely exists and this La Nación article from 2004 calls it one of interior Argentina's oldest stations; it started as a carrier current/cable station, too. Keep and let me fix this mess. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Coin945: I've at least made the page a reasonable stub. A lot of dead sites and probably undigitized source material. Sometimes with Argentina it's tough to get even the basic info on a station, especially legal records. eswiki is known to find most radio stations not notable by their standards, by the way. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Sammi, whose judgement I am inclined to trust as unimpeachable within her niche. Comparing notability between different projects is hard; by conventional wisdom enwiki is more likely to delete, but there are quite a few cases where the other major projects define things stricter than we do. Vaticidalprophet 05:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.