Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Aldin Porter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to General authority. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

L. Aldin Porter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BEFORE source searches, this subject fails WP:BASIC notability standards to qualify for an article. Said searches are providing no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and very little coverage in said sources at all. Those found consists of fleeting passing mentions, name checks and quotations, the latter of which are primary in nature. Additionally, the article is entirely dependent upon primary sources and one unreliable source, none of which establish notability. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to general authority. Trillfendi (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to general authority. Not notable enough for an independent article. Britishfinance (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He is not mentioned in General authority, but he is mentioned (as a list entry) in List of general authorities of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Emeritus, so if redirect is the outcome I would recommend that article/section as the preferred target. Bakazaka (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Per nom or Redirect per User:Bakazaka. Primary sources only and not notable. Otr500 (talk) 03:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.