Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Union du centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

L'Union du centre

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived political party that never ran any candidates. What little interest it received was due to the involvement of Robert Dutil, a former cabinet minister, but there's so little to say about this party that it can be mentioned on his article (in fact, it is). Perhaps tellingly, the party does not have a corresponding page on the French Wikipedia.

I would have PRODed this but I wanted to check if anyone thinks there's anything worth merging. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Political parties don't get an automatic notability freebie just because it's possible to technically verify that they exist(ed) — the notability test requires reliable source coverage attesting to some form of political impact. Nominator is entirely correct that what little we actually need or can properly source about this party can be contained entirely within Dutil's existing BLP, without needing a standalone article. Bearcat (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, more information could be built about the subject at Robert Dutil but I don't see anything here that cries out to be merged. - Astrophobe (talk) 03:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.