Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvindesland (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kvindesland

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We usually keep surname pages, but in this case, I couldn't establish it meeting WP:GNG (surname pages are articles rather than disambiguation pages, so are subject to the same criteria as articles, although they are often poorly formed.)

It doesn't even function, as many surname articles do, like a disambiguation page too, as there are no notable people of this name.

Was previously deleted, in 2004 AfD, but that was a long time ago. A possible WP:ATD is to Tysvær#Geography. My concern though, is that the information in that article concerning this surname is unsourced. Boleyn (talk) 05:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no interest for Wikipedia. Geschichte (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only useful if there are notable people of that surname. Possibly could be moved to Wiktionary? Joseph2302 (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.