Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuttlefish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:CORP joe decker ^talk 06:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kuttlefish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable Web business, only marginal coverage. See WP:CORP and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• There are 15+ indepedent and international sources that support this entry, however the majority are considered "blogs" and therefore have not been included. The company also has a Facebook following of 140k, which is notable for a web business and indicates that it is "attracting notice".Erothkopf (talk) 16:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now - Nothing to suggest better yet. SwisterTwister talk 23:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Additional notable source added. Erothkopf (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the additional source added [1] is a very short PR blurb. The model of an unreliable source. DGG ( talk ) 02:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Added an additional notable, international source (notable for it's following, e.g. 62,000 Facebook followers).Erothkopf (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.