Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Pandya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete soum (0_o) 17:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal Pandya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No sign of significance, aside from the unsubstantiated claim that he's "high profile" (which just stopped from speedily deleting it). It reads like a vanity article, to be honest. Mel Etitis (Talk) 21:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't see that this meets the requirements of WP:BIO. The second of the two external links leads to some kind of Indian dating site—could that be a clue? Deor 00:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If you think that the word 'high profile' is an unsubstantiated claim then you could have rather chosen to edit/delete this word and not the whole article. The second link is to metrojoint.com of which Kunal is the co-founder. They don't have any management page on metrojoint so that I can link it. A few regional newspaper articles lead me to create this page as he is perhaps the first and only entreprenuer from the state of Gujarat (India) to venture into an internet company. These local newspapers do not have a web version. He owns ncrypted technologies (ncrypted.net) and you can find a link of them on metrojoint itself. Sparshmehra 04:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  User's fourteenth edit; previous edits all concerning this article. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:BIO. Article completely lacks sources that would demonstrate notability. janejellyroll 04:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep Why? Mel, I dont know what's wrong here. I am not here to contribute to the whole society like you. I am just concerned about topics I know of and I feel like writing on. You better reply to the above stated message and tell me why we should still delete this article? And delete it for what reasons? Due to lack of sources? I already linked to his profile on ncrypted's page (which is universal) - I hope you know how big the company is. And ncrypted clearly mentions that they created metrojoint.com. So, both of my links demonstrate enough notability. Should I scan those local newspapers and paste it here for your kind consideration as well? Sparshmehra 12:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  One "vote" per User. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Founder of a handful of non-notable Web start-ups. I may be able to support this if reliable sources were provided, but not as is. Article is walking the fine line between bio & VSCT. Caknuck 23:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.