Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristian Gravenor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kristian Gravenor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely composed of unsourced statements, almost all of which are of questionable factuality. Source searching for this individual shows a number of mentions, but I am having trouble finding sources that meet WP:GNG. The most coverage I've found so far is the Montreal Gazette article cited on the page, which is largely based on statements by the subject. Regardless of notability, the article as it currently exists appears highly promotional and does not reliably back up any of its claims. Removing the uncited content would result in a blank page, save perhaps for a statement about a book he authored and the business info cited by a newspaper article I have been unable to verify. I would have tried WP:G11 but it appears the tag was added and removed already without an explanation. ASUKITE 21:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note:This is actually the first nomination for this article, as far as I can tell. It looks like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristian Gravenor may have been created in error. ASUKITE 22:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ASUKITE 21:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ASUKITE 21:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ASUKITE 21:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. ASUKITE 21:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a lot of completely unsourced content here, suggesting conflict of interest editing by somebody with insider knowledge, but there's very little evidence that he would actually pass WP:CREATIVE: one review of one book in his hometown local newspaper is not in and of itself enough coverage to establish the notability of said book. Since the "first AFD" wasn't really a true AFD discussion, but actually a misplaced attempt to begin creating this article in the wrong venue for that, I've deleted it and moved this page to the undisambiguated title. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.