Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KredX

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KredX

KredX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH as I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The article has been created by a single-purpose account with a likely conflict of interest and is just a free advertisement for the startup company. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A WP:SPA article describing a start-up company's proposition, referenced to sources which are routine announcement coverage and brief mentions. I am not seeing a substantial claim to attained encyclopaedic notability or the WP:RS coverage needed for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- corporate spam on a nn company; likely a paid contribution in violation of TOU. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill company, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 14:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.