Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kollaboration (talent show)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kollaboration (talent show) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Finding only unrelated news hits, primary, blogs, social media links. It has a lot of claims of "notable participants" and locations, but can't verify it is notable with only primary links. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:09, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete only has primary sources. Fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 12:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no external sources.--Avala (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.