Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I never considered Norway's mountains to be generic. Breathtakingly beautiful maybe but generic never. Forgive me for refusing to endorse that part of the successful delete argument.(this is intended to be a humorous comment) Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kolla

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is about a non notable mountain in Norway which doesn't cite any sources and no links with other articles. Abishe (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOLAND. The no.wiki article is sourced. Mccapra (talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Is sourced" is not satisfactory when the one source is just a map, as per WP:NGEO "This guideline specifically excludes maps and various tables from consideration when establishing topic notability, because these sources often establish little except the existence of the subject." WP:GEOLAND4 does apply but there is not content besides coordinates and a statistic. This is among many (see Category:Mountains of Innlandet) auto-generated by the same banned user without any assertion of notability – Norway has a lot of generic mountains! Reywas92^Talk 02:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough sources to establish GNG and does not pass our SNG. Wm335td (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.