Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkata Mirror

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 14:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kolkata Mirror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone please point me towards one iota of decent non-trivial coverage in reliable sources....... ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The key details. What it was. When it was established. And when it folded. Dp you have a source for that? FloridaArmy (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I emailed one blogger who is interested in the news-arena and as far as he remember(s)/recall(s), it was a joint effort by ABP and TOI to launch a website along the patterns of Mumbai Mirror with more space for citizen-reporting.(At that time, several more domains Punemirror.com, Hyderabadmirror.com et al were also registered by the same company for future utilization along the same lines).But, the site failed to make any minimal impact and was pulled weeks post-launch.Basically, it appeared and vanished without any foot-marks.~ Winged BladesGodric 05:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Redirect per nom. Deb (talk) 08:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Absolutely nothing noteworthy about the publication is mentioned in the article. Plenty of irrelevant content, including info about its sister newspapers for some reason. Norcaes (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nomination. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 08:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.