Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Know Risk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Know Risk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional material since creation by an old account with no edits outside of this article, ANZIIF and the IPA. Does not meet WP:NPRODUCT. The three non primary sources in article don't appear sufficient - sources 9 and 10 are routine coverage about an award, source 11 is paywalled. Google and news search turns up nothing. Darcyisverycute (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Australia. Darcyisverycute (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Aside from knowing various risk factors, I can't find sourcing for this subject. Agree with the sources as described, most are PROMO or primary. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails NPRODUCT. Owen× ☎ 16:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:48, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promotional spam Wolfson5 (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.