Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleio Valentien

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kleio Valentien

Kleio Valentien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with hopeless sourcing. Now that Pornbio is depreceated this no longer seems to have any claim to inclusion. No objections to a suitable redirect to any suitable awards list. Spartaz Humbug! 21:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete another article that is on a non-notable pornographic performer. I applaud the nominator for being willing to wade through the poor sourcing and see this article for the not supported by good sourcing mess it is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lacks independent RS coverage needed to pass WP:BASIC or support notability claims per WP:ENT. The references in the article are the usual interviews, press releases and porn award rosters. An independent search yielded only trivial independent RS coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.