Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirsty Hinchcliffe

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kirsty Hinchcliffe

Kirsty Hinchcliffe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A recurring role in Haven and fourth billing on The Third Nail aren't enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Also, an external link to her resume isn't exactly kosher. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also a likely WP:COI by an WP:SPA. The creator is User:Kirstyagnes and this suggests the actress's middle name is Agnes (relative listed is likely her husband, though her age is different). Clarityfiend (talk) 05:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 02:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 02:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 02:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Going from "Weak Delete" to Delete on account of the blatantly promotional nature of the text. It never helps, shouldn't this be known by now? -The Gnome (talk) 13:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete nothing even close to meeting notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete ran a proquest news archive search and found nothing beyond gossip column mention .E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.