Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Rathod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kiran Rathod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This stub almost qualifies for WP:BLPPROD except for the unreliable reference to IMDB.

Google search finds this Wikipedia article and many vanity hits (Facebook, LinkedIn) and fancruft. No evidence of critical attention.

Does not satisfy general notability or entertainment notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A month ago this article had an extensive filmography, paragraphs of text, and 3 non-imdb sources (whose Reliability I don't know about) but was then substantialky reduced in size with comment "(none of these are rs)". Mouse-overs of a few of the films listed show her listed in the lead paragraph of four out of the five I checked. Better sources may be needed, but it looks as if the article should be kept on the basis of starring/featuring in multiple films. PamD 09:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: She seems often to be referred to as just "Kiran" eg in Winner (2003 film) and here, which will complicate the finding of sources. PamD 09:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have found and added one reliable source (The Hindu), which supports one statement in the article. I have also removed all the unsourced BLP content (ie all the rest, bar the lead sentence), and commented it out from the info box. I have left the Filmography untouched, as the links to articles on the films seem to confirm the info that Kiran appeared in those films, though it's technically unsourced. This article has been tagged since Nov 2017 as needing sources, and none have been supplied (until this one), but the woman does appear notable. None of Jupitus Smart's links seem to work for me. PamD 18:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An editor has now added some content with Reliable Sources which I think establish her notability thoroughly. PamD 23:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @PamD:. I seem to be getting rusty at this. The actual links were [1], [2], [3] and [4]. Jupitus Smart 06:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It is high time we deleted all articles lacking even one reliable source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep She does meet WP:ENT by virtue of having played the female lead alongside some of the top brass of Indian cinema. She has starred as the main heroine in movies like Anbe Sivam, Gemini, Winner and Thandavam. Found some more references, like [5], [6], [7] and [8]. Can be salvaged if somebody has the time to incorporate these and edit the article. Jupitus Smart 18:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep passes WP:NACTOR She is not an english movie actor and still we have enough WP:SIGCOV in english media. Number of movies also supports her notability. --DBigXrayᗙ 21:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:NACTOR, and WP:BASIC per links provided by Jupitus Smart. wumbolo ^^^ 12:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.