Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinnek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kinnek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an non-notable private company; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, interviews, routine funding news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources; for example, this piece calls the company an "Alibaba wannabe" [1]. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. The references offered are routine start-up coverage of proposition and funding, and my searches are not finding better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of the sources are routine reports of funding of the kind that any start-up generates. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom.--SamHolt6 (talk) 07:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are mostly routine start-up like press release material. Lacypaperclip (talk) 04:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.