Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingsley Fresh Onyenma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsley Fresh Onyenma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable studio assistant and script editor. Doesn't meet notability criteria. Yintan 18:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above, plus all self sources, no third party coverage or notice. JamesG5 (talk) 01:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If you choose to delete the article, please nominate file:Kingsley Onyenma.jpg in Commons for deletion and link this AfD request. Taivorist (talk) 10:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unlikely to meet WP:GNG, as there is no significant coverage. Fails both WP:ANYBIO and WP:BASIC. The file at the Commons should be nominated for deletion if this article gets deleted. Ceosad (talk) 18:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I concur, there's no actual substance for notability here and that's exactly why it was PRODed to begin with. SwisterTwister talk 08:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.