Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Sutherland

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Sutherland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Allied45 (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Shaidar cuebiyar: would you mind clarifying which of the criteria in WP:MUSICBIO you believe the subject satisfies? Colin M (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Colin M: specifically: #1 and #4. Others may be applicable, but only one is necessary for notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't think the OAM confers notability. According to the infobox at Order of Australia, around 25,000 have been awarded since 1975. The only independent coverage I can find is this brief local notice of a concert given by her choir group, thus I don't think WP:GNG is satisfied. As for criterion 4 of WP:MUSICBIO, "Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.", while the article mentions her choir group touring Australia and Canada, the "non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources" portion is not satisfied. The only citation given is an event page for a local concert, with the event description mentioning the group "will be touring to the Kathaumixw Festival in Canada in July". I can find no other sources describing a tour. Colin M (talk) 23:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unfortunately. The OAM by itself does not confer notability; the albums do not seem to have been released on a major or notable independent label; and I find very little coverage of the subject at all. I wondered if the Hunter Singers might be notable, but there did not seem to be much coverage of them, either. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.