Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill the Buzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep as redirect to Revealed Recordings#Artists per the results at the contemporaneous RfD. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kill the Buzz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Note this was CSD sometime around around the beginning of may 2018, then again in august, then again in April 2009 then again deleted in March 2020 (as a draft), then it was recreated as a redirect on the 8th of June.Slatersteven (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note it has not been converted back to a redirect, which just looks like an attempt to keep the name on Wikipedia by the back door.Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Note: This had also been nominated at WP:RFD, which I have since closed as a keep. Any concerns about keeping the article history viewable can be addressed here. There's no need to have both open at the same time, and there didn't seem to be any question about the redirect itself being problematic. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 04:07, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a redirect to Revealed Recordings#Artists. The old version of the article doesn't even assert a credible claim of significance, so we don't need to reach notability; that version would have been eligible for {{db-person}}. But it redirects to a sensible location which mentions the article title, so that's fine. There's no need for revision deletion. However, I might suggest semi-protection or (possibly) full protection if it keeps getting converted into an article. --NYKevin 04:13, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well its still being played about with.Slatersteven (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have tools for that. If it's a single user (or a small number of apparent SPAs), then we can warn or block the offending user(s). If not, then we can apply an appropriate level of protection. But we should not allow disruptive editing to dictate the contents of the encyclopedia. If a redirect is appropriate, then it is appropriate. --NYKevin 21:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.