Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidding on the square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kidding on the square

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blank article. Unless an inter-wiki redirect is sufficient reason for a blank article? BilledMammal (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Having a blank article that is an interwiki redirect is ok, as long as it meets certain requirements. Per WP:SSRT, Please keep in mind that only topics with a less-than-encyclopedic scope that are commonly wikified words or that are repeatedly recreated should become soft redirects. This article does not fit that statement and therefore should be deleted. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 05:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Empty article. No value. Tessaracter (talk) 07:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.