Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khetsingh Khangar

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Draftifying. You can find the article at Draft:Khetsingh Khangar. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 18:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khetsingh Khangar

Khetsingh Khangar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, and has no sources. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 16:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I've Done.) 16:24, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes... agree! This article needs attentions from someone who has full knowledge on Gujarat history. VocalIndia (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 17:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify: Did a WP:Before and lot of images and videos from youtube regarding the subject showed up along with some sources (mostly unreliable). This could be developed into a better article by someone who actually have an idea about Gujarat history. Chances are there for the availability of both online and offline sources in the local language or Hindi. And the sources provided by VocalIndia indicates that the subject was one of a historical figure. So deleting it without giving an option to remodify would be unfair. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help? 17:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify pointing the author to guidelines as to how to write a WP article (for example omitting ! marks). The article makes a lot of extravagant claims, which makes me think there is a Hindutva bias in the article. If kept it needs to be heavily tagged for Verification and proper sourcing. Some of the text appears to be in untranslated Hindi, which will not do. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 02:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kashmorwiki You're also an Indian editor, I see you are one of the best edtors from India, why not make the article better? VocalIndia (talk) 04:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
VocalIndia, you mentioned that its still a work in progress. Right? Thats the reason why we have an option to move such articles into draftspace. It is hard to find sources about the subject in this case. It might be available in other local languages. So an expert editor who is interested in this field is needed here. Thats why I said to draftify this article. And by the way, thankyou for your appreciation:) Kichu🐘 Need any help? 06:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Current version is enough for Wikipedia's article standard ! VocalIndia (talk) 17:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The article has been drastically rewritten since its nomination and first relisting. It should be given another look for further consideration. @Johnpacklambert, DrKay, and Peterkingiron: ping.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.