Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khabrain Abhi Tak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Khabrain Abhi Tak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance, doesn't seem to meet notability. Itsalleasy (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 16:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 16:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now - That author has been starting several TV channel articles and it's to think several may be notable, I'm not finding any good sources to suggest better improvement and notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete appears to fail WP:BROADCAST, there is no mention of a licence, and it is broadcast only in some regions, the article here may have been created with the intention to promote the channel, they are certainly trying to get added to cable or satellite dish networks, according to trheir website Kraxler (talk) 03:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.