Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kentee Suone Pasek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 05:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kentee Suone Pasek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is an autobiography with numerous references to local group exhibitions and minor shows, including reviews of high school achievement, taken from the artist's website. Self-promotion which satisfies neither notability nor significance standards, per WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. Disclosure: I originally nominated this for speedy, and discussed rationale on talk page, as an anonymous IP. A review of the content and the sources suggest the speedy route was justified. JNW (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  20:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Modernist (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 01:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't meet WP:BIO, certainly not WP:CREATIVE, plus WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY issues are naastee.--Cerejota (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CREATIVE Vartanza (talk) 06:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per above, nothing much to add. FingersOnRoids♫ 21:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all - nb , transcluding or whatever to list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions seems not to be working - that only shows the nom + 1 comment. ok now, thanks Johnbod (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.