Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Fields
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ken Fields
- Ken Fields (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD declined. Article makes absolutely no assertion that this individual is notable. This person is not Army's 1933 triple-threat back nor the spokesman for the Firestone tire company. Wtshymanski (talk) 13:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Under your search criteria for news subject does appear in multiple articles specifically in 2008 and 2009 Miami Herald. Two were referenced with the update - forgive me for being a relative newbie not sure how to pull those articles from archive at Herald. Kbursten (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment by nominator References to assert notability don't usually include press releases. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment by Kbursten I don't believe any of the news articles are press releases. There are at least four found in the Miami Herald and multiple others from local / community news papers. I would be happy to post links to the archives, however, once again, I do not know how to pull the full story from the archives. Kbursten (talk) 11:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.