Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keirda Bahruth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 22:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keirda Bahruth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created two films that appear to be notable, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Every source in the article is spammy or primary or has nothing to do with the subject. Prod declined. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, California, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as the deletion rationale is misguided. The essay the nominator cites does not apply to people like filmmakers: "That is not to say that this is always the case (four of the notability guidelines, for creative professions, books, films and music, do allow for inherited notability in certain circumstances)..." If she created a significant or well-known body of work, then she's notable for her oeuvre. pburka (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and edit for promotional tone, per WP:FILMMAKER#3 and her collective body of work and the reviews and articles about the work, e.g. Bob and the Monster: Film Review (Hollywood Reporter, Mar. 2011), 'Bob And The Monster': The Curious Question Of What You Leave Out (NPR, Jun. 2011), Bob Forrest’s unlikely career arc (LA Times, Aug. 2011), Risen from the gutter, he whispers hope to Hollywood's junkies (CNN, Dec. 2011), Bob and the Monster (Variety, Nov. 2011); Embracing Life Under Scrutiny, Before the Dawn of Nonstop Tweets (New York Times, Aug. 2009), We Live In Public (Variety, 2009), But every day we do, we die a little in private (Robert Ebert, Oct. 2009), Ondi Timoner, “We Live in Public”: Authenticity, Emotionality, and Technology (IndieWire, 2009) (also "won the Sundance Grand Jury Prize in the U.S. documentary category"). Beccaynr (talk) 00:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.