Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keep the Fire Burning (Jaci Velasquez album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Fire Burning (Jaci Velasquez album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Independent album that did not chart and has no notable coverage. Toa Nidhiki05 17:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (to Jaci Velasquez) - doesn't satisfy WP:NALBUM and couldn't find anything in a BEFORE sweep to demonstrate such Nosebagbear (talk) 10:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A redirect is not necessary as it's not a likely search term. Adding an entry linking to the musician's article at the DAB would be a better choice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - how is this in any way notable? It's totally run of the mill and, but its own admission, uncommon. Bearian (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.