Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. PROD removed by the creator citing 'keep' verdict on Polish Wikipedia (pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2021:04:10:Kazimierz Zakrzewski (rotmistrz)). However, Polish Wikipedia seems much more inclusive then ours for military figures - the main argument there was that being a commander of "the 1st Krechowce Uhlan Regiment with the rank of rittmeister" is sufficient. Well, it may be for pl Wikipedia, but I am afraid it m ay not be enough for English given the subject otherwise fails GNG. The subject received Cross of Independence but is described as the "second highest Polish military decorations", so I have my doubts if it is a sufficient to m ake the subject notable - but it certainly merits some discussion. PS. WP:NSOLDIER was depreciated, and a single award of second-highest award wouldn't meet it anyway ([1]). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 09:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. A cavalry squadron commander, albeit awarded the second highest decoration, has to do something extraordinary to distinguish himself enough for an article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I believe the article is sufficiently sourced. It's a keeper for this old brain - GizzyCatBella🍁 07:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• DeleteThe sources from where the data is taken are not reliable. Doesn't seems notable to me.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.