Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazakh Wikipedia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →B music ian 03:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh Wikipedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website, per WP:NOTABLE, composed of first-hand sources. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this is an exception to WP:N (which is a guideline, not policy) as a WMF project. →Σ τ c. 06:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I added two sources and more are available. There is a lot of coverage in Kazakh media, especially because of the digitalization of Kazakh Encyclopedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Turns out some big players like Nokia, Samruk-Kazyna/Timur Kulibayev and even the prime minister are getting involved in promoting the Kazakh Wikipedia (check out Количество статей в Казахской Википедии перевалило за 100 тысяч and Wikibilim). Such high-level support specifically for the Kazakh Wikipedia certainly gives it notability. Otebig (talk) 09:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.