Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Clapp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Clapp

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible COI promotional article on a non notable Russian blogger who fails GNG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search turns up nothing concrete. They fail to satisfy WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO as well. Furthermore they are a singer but fail to meet any criterion from from WP:SINGER. The sources used are predominantly unreliable as they are either self published or user generated. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless Russian sources are found, I don't see much. A brief few sentences in a Guardian article and one in GMA news saying she created a lipstick colour. Oaktree b (talk) 16:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Internet. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An article should speak for itself, but this article does not explain why the subject is notable. Many of the sources are unreliable. The article has been reference-bombed with low-quality sources, and the sources have not been and will not be assessed in depth. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:ANYBIO. Jeni Wolf (talk) 11:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Kadı Message 21:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.