Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasha Mann

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kasha Mann

Kasha Mann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC as there is zero coverage in reliable sources, as far as I can tell. SmartSE (talk) 20:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NMUSIC. CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The New York Beacon article might be one suitable source, but of the article's other sources: Top40-Charts.com is WP:BADCHARTS; MTV is self-published; DRT is not WP:GOODCHARTS; Record World is a reprint of DRT; StarCentral is a primary source interview; and IMEA is a trivial mention of a non-notable award. Searches of Google, Google News, Google Books, AllMusic, Billboard, Oxford Music Online, HighBeam Research, InfoTrac, and ProQuest turned up no sources that would establish notability. With at most one reliable, third-party, secondary source, the subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Worldbruce (talk) 21:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per Worldbruce's excellent analysis of the sources. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.