Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasethan Kadavulada (2011 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kasethan Kadavulada (2011 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any reliable sources and reviews for the film. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - plenty of sources on the subject, including direct coverage here [1] [2] and reviews here [3], [4] and here [5]. Confirmation of release here:[6] Feel free to add these and remove nomination. Neutral Fan (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete There does seem to be a few reviews, but they are of questionable quality. Especially the third one. Which isn't even a review from what I can tell. Outside of that, confirmations of releases don't count for notability. Since it's already obvious this movie exists or we wouldn't be discussing it. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Agree with Neutral Fan's observations. Sources are credible. Article meets WP:NFILM requirements. Ktin (talk) 05:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, Neutral Fan demonstrates notability with sources.--Hippeus (talk) 11:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment My bad, can I close the nomination? TamilMirchi (talk) 22:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a weak delete vote so it cannot be speedy closed, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as has reliable sources reviews and other coverage identified in this discussion so that WP:GNG and WP:NFILM are passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Also meets WP:NFILM WP:GNG -- Padavalam🌂  ►  07:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.