Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karnan (2020)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karnan (2020) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of content that was moved to draft space to Draft:Karnan (2020 film), the redirect was deleted under R2, which makes this part WP:G4 recreation of deleted (or moved content). This can also be classed for WP:G6 as the article is in Draft space. However for some reason previous admin doesn't want to follow standard operating protocol and wants this to goto AFD which seems bizarre! Article fails WP:GNG, (A7) is not good enough for main-space in it's current form and shouldn't be in main-space in it's current form. Govvy (talk) 08:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 08:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:G4 is the recreation of content that was deleted after a deletion discussion, so it does not apply as there has never been a deletion discussion about this article before. There is no provision in WP:G6 to delete an article where there is also a Draft of the same article. While this article does appear to fail GNG, that fact does not make it eligible for WP:A7 as there are lots of articles that survive A7 deletion that do not pass GNG. A7 is only applicable to certain subject areas and movies is not one of those subject areas. If the standard protocol is to delete articles that have been previously moved to Draft space and then recreated under some IAR or shoehorned in speedy deletion criterion, I will not follow that procedure. All that said this should be Deleted as it does not meet notability guidelines. If it is deleted via this discussion then it would be eligible for WP:G4 if recreated as an article. ~ GB fan 10:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.