Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaosarah Adeyi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 07:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaosarah Adeyi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a young political operator who has never been elected to office. The sourcing is mostly interviews and recycled PR. I don’t see anything making a case for notability. Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Laudable achievements by the young lady but does not meet WP:NPOL. The coverage basically copy and pasted each other reporting her nomination as a commissioner. This [1] would have made 1E inapplicable but it was not reported by a reliable source. Most likely too soon for this budding politician. TheSokks_(talk) 18:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being an unelected political advisor is not an automatic notability freebie under WP:NPOL, but the sourcing is not solid enough to get her over WP:GNG for it. Bearcat (talk) 01:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment She is an office holder and I believe she deserves a Wikipedia page. I can't imagine the page being deleted, does it help to reduce the wide gap we are working at bridging or it is widening it. I would really appreciate if this page still stay. Will ensure to update the article as requested Regards, James Moore200 (talk) 12:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- James Moore200, Not all office holders are presumed notable. We have a guideline at WP:POLITICIAN. Vexations (talk) 10:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.