Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kami Andrews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kami Andrews

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO with her award being a scene award. Fails the general notability guidelines. Interview cited is on a self-published site. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails both WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. Buggie111 (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with fire as a GNG fail. Also note that the following is unsourced Biography of a Living Person material: "Andrews married at age 18, but divorced before she entered pornography. She spent the first year of her career as a bondage model, before moving on to hardcore. Her first film was New Chicks On The Cock 4." Anybody have a problem with that? Nah, probably not. Porn bios are awesome always — some of the worst writing and worst sourcing on the encyclopedia. Carrite (talk) 03:25, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Award and nominations come up short for WP:PORNBIO. Fails GNG without non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources. Only non-trivial GNews hit at Wired is not completely independent of the subject. Google Book hits are passing mentions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. From WP:PORNBIO: Nominations and awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration. And her only award is from a group scene, ergo not notable. --NINTENDUDE ⁶⁴ 03:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails relevant notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.