Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalpana (1960 film)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per issues with its author. AFD is rendered moot. If a neutral editor wishes to recreate an article on this topic, ping me. Schmidt, Michael Q. 21:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kalpana (1960 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film I can't find any notability for Wgolf (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:INDAFD: [1]
  • Keep per meeting WP:NF. For 50-year-old pre-internet Hindi films I urge the nominator to be a bit more creative in his searches. It is often learned that even weak new stubs are not unsourcable, and that these films have become part of the enduring historic record for early Hindi cinema.[2] Like for instance, when a senior actor's or filmmaker's career is discussed, and media will include information about earlier significant works.[3][4][5][6] No, these old films will not have the coverage of some modern Western blockbuster... but they are suitable stubs. Schmidt, Michael Q. 19:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.